I hate it when I don’t follow my own advice, and even more, I hate admitting it. Way back when we got the Trump government in 2016, it seemed as if everyone went out of their minds daily, experiencing some variety of trauma activation from some latest news item. The restimulations were neverending. I urgently admonished everyone, including myself, to regulate their news consumption! But one thing I never stopped doing was tuning in to the BBC first thing after waking up. I managed my quantity pretty well, but the timing, well, not so much. First thing in the morning is a delicate moment. On November 22nd, shortly after awakening, I flipped on the news to a passing clip of literally seconds, announcing, “…Pablo Milanés has died. He was 79.” It hit me like bricks and then an immediate avalanche of memory.

Pablo, along with his colleague and often collaborator Silvio Rodriguez, was the founding voice of the Nueva Trova Cubana, the New Cuban Song Movement emerging in the late 1960s. A mix of traditional and folk rhythms and instruments with political, social, lyrical, and popular themes, the “trova” was the soundtrack of some of my loneliest, most painful, and at the time, inexplicably difficult post-traumatic years. Pablo’s honey-like baritone was the ever-available company and comforting accompaniment to the darkest of times. His song Tengo (I Have) is the epitome of gratitude: a musical accounting of all the precious things one has. It became my favorite song of all time. 

Pablo also introduced me to the exquisite poetry of Jose Marti, which he even more exquisitely transformed into glorious song. I keep only two CDs in my car for those times when I am completely addled by the Bay Bridge traffic: Pablo’s Versos de Jose Marti and Silvio’s Mujeres. They unfailingly get me over the bridge and home. It was on my bucket list to see Pablo in person. I did manage to see Silvio in Oakland once. But Pablo – it never came to be. Now it never will. I was heartbroken.

Attachment trauma makes relationships such a minefield, a Rubik’s cube of challenges.

Imaginary Friends

Attachment trauma makes relationships such a minefield, a Rubik’s cube of challenges. Loving and often idealizing iconic figures I had never met was a way to populate a lonely world—an illusion of a relationship, certainly company in the bittersweet solitude. I say bittersweet because being alone was a refuge: a cozy, comfortable, safe place, like my carnation pink weighted blanket, where, when swaddled in its soft and caressing velvet folds, I find restful peace. But at the same time, it was the gnawing echo of being left alone too much, the punishing, unchosen, agonizing solitude that defies nature’s design and evokes something else. We cannot “remember“ our infancy. But the aching heart and disproportional, unrelenting pain of loss that feels like dying is usually an undeniable clue that the core injury was interpersonal and usually unimaginably early. Even if all the family lore might tell us that there were people there who loved us, hidden in the deep recesses of brain and body is a story of parents who, for whatever reason, simply couldn’t. 

“Hero worship” became a middle ground for me. There were important people in my life who I did not have to worry about whether they liked me; they taught and influenced me, became my beloved role models. Sometimes I made an effort to learn about their real lives, which was much harder before we had Google, Wikipedia, and other technological avenues of inquiry. Other times I did not, and often, in fact, ignorance is bliss – finding out who the real person is can be a disappointment or even a blow. I did not want to know if there was animosity or competition between Pablo and Silvio in real life. I wanted to get lost in the harmony. Reading the recent memoir by Bono is a case in point. Although he is not on my shortlist, I have always admired and appreciated him, and still do. But I don’t “like” him very much. Just as many solve the conundrum of intimacy by creating a fantasy cyber sexual world, a “relationship” that is quiet, interior and inherently safe fills a certain void – sort of. Thankfully, now on my own Tengo accounting, I have both. But the loss of Pablo is still a blow.

Trauma has no time sense, no time stamp, as it were.

Loss

For the child of neglect, loss and disappointment seem on the order of life-threatening. In their own minds, the intensity is completely normal, even “reasonable,” like ambient air. Often a partner or loved one simply cannot understand why experimentation, or even moderate risk, is not an option. What is the big deal? Hope and disappointment are to be avoided like the plague, because the primal loss was in the domain of survival. An infant alone will die, and the early, unremembered experience of being left, even the later remembered experiences of inexplicable invisibility or abandonment, strike way too close to feeling fatal. 

Things never did change in that family, or not in a good way. The very notion that someone would change who or how they are out of love for me? Out of the question. It is what makes relationship therapy such a hard sell for so many adult children of neglect. What’s the point? Things don’t change, not for the better, and certainly not in relationships. The risk of disappointment is simply too great, not worth it. Where, on one hand, disappointment is a fact of life, as familiar as an old shoe, that it is almost like a companion on the trail for many the child of neglect, it is to be avoided at all costs – which can also be a sticking point in couples. Often, I struggle with those close to me being “hope averse,” or I am impatient with their hopelessness. I have to work hard to stay empathic and compassionate; perhaps it strikes too close to my own mostly healed trauma.

Time

Certain catchphrases from years of training in whatever discipline have always stuck in my mind. One that is indelibly etched is “the amygdala knows no time.” Trauma has no time sense, no time stamp, as it were. I used to wonder why in my art therapy drawings and paintings I so often produced a clock stopped at 4:10. I don’t know why. But I do know that trauma feels interminable, like it will never end, while also being at dizzying, breakneck speeds. In a split second, the world has crashed irreversibly into something else. I remember being told that the “nature of the beast,” in this case, the beast being depression, was that while in it feels like it will never end. However, in the rearview, it is hard to imagine or even remember how or why it felt that bad. “Pandemic time” is kind of like that…

All the trauma treatment modalities I studied seemed to have a protocol or practice for awakening a sense of time, a sense of movement. In EMDR, it was “what happens next?” In Sensorimotor Psychotherapy, it would be following the sensation as it morphs into one and the next iteration of itself and moves through the body. In some relaxation approaches, there would be counting. The intention is to activate a sense of movement, of time passing, of a possibility, a seed of change, of something different being possible. That is perhaps one reason why we measure anniversaries and orbits around the sun. We need to know that there is some forward movement and a reason to keep going. That is what I like best about the changing of the year. Something old is closed; something new will open in its place. Grief, if not ending altogether, will diminish and change over time. Something else will take its place. Cheesemaking, gardening, pregnancy: these are endeavors that we can only undertake if we believe there will be a future. Why else would we spend hours and sometimes backbreaking effort for something that takes months or longer to come to fruition?

I wish for all that the closing of the year will bring a promise of something different and better. One thing I love about Tengo, is the recounting of life treasures connotes that these are perhaps things I did not have before, or that many do not have. The line that invariably still brings me to tears is when Pablo sings ”Aprendi a leer, a contar, y aprendi a escribir!” I learned to read, to count, and I learned to write!” What blessings!

I close the year with these words translated from Jose Marti’s Versos Sencillos, “Simple Verses:”

Everything is beautiful and constant

Everything is music and reason,

And everything, like the diamond,

Before light, is coal.

Gracias, Pablo. Happy New Year

Today’s song is the beautiful Tengo by Pablo Milanés. I hope you love it as much as I do.

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

Many people don’t know that Chanukah is a holiday about miracles. Ironically, at least in the US, the winter holiday season tends to be an extra hard or outright miserable time for so many people, especially those who have complicated or nonexistent relationships with family, leaving them feeling more lonely and ashamed than usual. With all the emphasis on celebrating and gifts, not having enough money or not receiving invitations or presents might add to feeling like a misfit, or a worthless being. That was certainly true for me, although I made a production of creating and giving gifts. I suppose that helped. Add to that the dark and cold season, and it all becomes a recipe for bleakness. Last week as December was just starting, I thought I would write about something inspirational or upbeat, like the recent serendipitous experience I had in Hawaii that I like to call Fire on the Mountain. I sat down to write.

But as I sat staring at the blank screen, I found myself typing “World of Neglect,” and, for whatever reason, fixating on the story of Brittney Griner. I complained about the biting chill of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (7 degrees Celsius) here these days, which to us in San Francisco is a “cold snap.” I wondered what the temperature would be in the Gulag-like conditions of Griner’s Mordovia prison camp. Again, I am no sports fan, but for some reason, I am compelled and fascinated by the stories of brilliant athletes. Griner’s story grabbed me from the day it broke back in February, now ten months ago. 

I am often disgusted and angered by the fickle and sensational news business, where a story hits and captures widespread concern, even outrage, only to sink into the quicksand of world neglect, upstaged by the next big story. I felt like Griner was all too rapidly forgotten, disappearing into the gaping void of world neglect. At least as far as I knew. I had to wonder, would she have been so easy to forget if she was white and straight? If it were, say, the cherubic blond quarterback of our local football team, the man I call “Lover-Boy,” would he have been forgotten and left to languish in the bowels of a Russian nightmare? My more hard-headed and politically-unbiased husband probably said so. But I am not convinced.

Unable to refocus on my “positive” agenda, I began researching Griner, curious to find out more about her story. I find her beautiful and her 6 foot nine (205.74 cm) frame so elegant and striking that it rather shocked me to learn that, always taller than her peers growing up in Houston, she suffered miserably and was mercilessly bullied in school. The other kids called her a “freak,” and she believed them. She was already suicidal by junior high school. And as she got older, wrestling with her sexuality, she finally summoned the courage to come out to her parents. Upon hearing it, her (most likely traumatized) Vietnam veteran father lost no time in kicking her out. That was all I could find about her sad childhood. But that colored my already bleak thoughts about her, locked away, forgotten in Siberia-like hard labor conditions. All day I could not shake the image of Brittney Griner, forgotten. I had not had a day like that before, fixated on her, a political football (basketball?) punted into outer space.

The next morning in the wee hours, I turned on the radio as I always do. The first thing I heard was that Brittney Griner was free! She was on the plane and on her way home. Admittedly I was instantly in tears. How did this happen?!

I am often disgusted and angered by the fickle and sensational news business, where a story hits and captures widespread concern, even outrage, only to sink into the quicksand of world neglect, upstaged by the next big story.

Fire on the Mountain

We had the good fortune to enjoy the Thanksgiving holiday on our beloved “home away from home,” the Big Island of Hawaii. We spent our first couple of days on the northeastern side of the island in Volcano, the little town where the famed Mauna Loa volcano majestically stands. After a lovely visit there, we took our leave, heading south to Kona on my favorite, the sunny side of the island. No sooner had we arrived in Kona, we heard the news that Mauna Loa had explosively erupted the day after we left, like it had not done since 1984. Although our friends who lived there assured us that they were safe and all was well, we kept hearing news reports of lava creeping and spilling further and ever wider across the roads. We felt as if we had dodged a bullet.

We had arranged for a day excursion during our time in Kona, up the 8,500-foot (2,590 meters) peak of Hualalai Mountain there. We had never been up there before, a bucket list item of my husband’s. It was to be a guided tour led by a lovely native guide named Kimo in his trusty but clearly well-worn Jeep off-road vehicle. We set out early, just the three of us, starting the long and rickety climb up the incredibly steep, rocky dirt road, and all the while, Kimo entertained us with stories about growing up with his 52 cousins, their parents, and grandparents on this sacred land. He pointed out elaborate ecosystems, describing how a beautiful creeping vine grew around the precious and sensitive Koa trees to protect them from the sun’s heat, so they could thrive. He also told us the sad story, common to so many native peoples, about how the government had quadrupled property taxes so quickly that his family were forced off their beloved ancestral land, and it was sold off to wealthy real estate developers. Kimo and many like him had to go to work building the very resort homes that took over their ancestral land, torn by compromise but dependent on the work to feed their kids. It reminded me of concentration camp victims and political prisoners forced to dig their own graves. 

Kimo was especially proud of Hualalai, which was most dear to his beloved grandmother. He was glad to have the opportunity to take us up there, and he had not been up there in over a week. After about 40 minutes lumbering and rumbling up the mountain, we reached the spot where the much-needed (by me) restroom was located. Kimo pulled over and I dashed inside. Emerging relieved, I saw Kimo madly running into the bushes toward rising smoke. The mountain was on fire. 

We threw all the bottled water he had packed into the jeep onto the smoldering embers to little avail, and apologetically, Kimo hurriedly told us we had to cancel the tour. Of course! But he felt terrible about it.

Like a racecar driver, Kimo got us down the ragged mountain in no time and called his community to help him come and fight the fire. He was so grateful to us! If we had not booked the tour, and if I had not had to go to the bathroom, he would not have been there to see the smoking embers spread into incipient flames. The whole mountain would have burned down. How do these things happen?

How does it happen that we serendipitously meet that certain person? How do stars seem miraculously to line up just so? What is the power of positive thinking, of good works? 

Serendipity

What does Brittney Griner have to do with Mauna Loa and Hualalai, trauma and neglect, you and me? I strive to be scientific about cause and effect, although there are things that we cannot explain, sometimes very wonderful. How does it happen that we serendipitously meet that certain person? How do stars seem miraculously to line up just so? What is the power of positive thinking, of good works? Sometimes out of the depth of dark despair, we are surprised by something inexplicably wonderful. A Tibetan Buddhist tradition, I am told, teaches that on certain days of the year, one’s good karmic works are multiplied a hundred million-fold. I make my donations to suicide prevention on those days. I like to think I can save a hundred million lives. Who knows? I guess we must just hang in and do our best!

Best wishes of the season! And to all a good night!

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

This week’s blog is all about pain, inspired by The Master Series: Pain Edition, coming soon in February. Use my code RC20 to get 20% off your tickets.

When we were growing up, if we did not feel well, our dad would say, “Get all ready for school and see how you feel after breakfast.” By the time I had done all that, I had pretty much no idea how I felt, and as a result, I ended up with a lifelong near-perfect attendance record. Unless I was actively vomiting, I assumed I was fine, and that too was rare. One of the handful of occasions I did was the unforgettable time in first grade when I threw up on the blacktop at recess, and someone circled it in chalk and scrawled in large caps, “RUTH DID THIS!” Oy vey, I guess that cured me of that particular affliction. 

In my first 30 years of private practice, I missed only two days of work for health reasons. Only in 2014, when I was struck by a systemic, near-septic infection that even I couldn’t ignore, I landed in the hospital for a week, and home watching baking YouTube videos for another week. There went that record. Until then, I was not only blessed with sterling health, but also cursed with florid hubris/denial and a completely failed sensibility of interoception. 

Interoception is the awareness and ability to perceive and read sensations within one’s body. The well-oiled organism emits constant signals to remain regulated, in balanced equilibrium and good working condition: food, hydration, rest, sex, temperature control, comfort, medical attention, etc. A good enough primary caregiver works to accurately read the cues and respond to them – not perfectly, of course, but well enough. That is how a child learns to perceive and interpret them, and ultimately, with luck, learns about self-care. With luck, that is. Many are not so lucky. Many of the little organisms, as we know, are met with pain and/or confusing overstimulation instead.

I developed an early interest in the ways trauma, eating disorders, and substance abuse met in a seamless braid because of my own sorry experience. I sought and found a largely unscientific little world of body approaches to psychological problems. My always ahead-of-her-time psychotherapist referred me to a colleague of hers who practiced what was called Self Acceptance Training probably well before 1980, which was the first body approach I ever tried. I don’t remember much of anything about it, but I stayed with it for quite a while and then became interested in bioenergetics and the writings of Wilhelm Reich, one of the early founders of more systematic body psychotherapy approaches. Although his work is in some ways quirky, I still find his book The Function of the Orgasm to be one of the great tomes of all time, and his unique way of bringing together social justice, psychology, and sexuality to be truly fascinating and not without merit. (His biography, Fury on Earth by Myron Sharaf, is also well worth the read!)

Now, as a field, we are blessed with truly evidence-based and effective body-oriented methodologies as well as a sophisticated literature that takes somatic psychotherapies out of the fringy or “woo-woo” category and into the highly respected trauma and even broader public mainstream. No need to mention Bessel van der Kolk’s record-defying blockbuster The Body Keeps the Score. We have all read it by now. 

It is now largely acknowledged that there are a host of (too many) confounding, somatic aberrations that may be the harbinger or the mouthpiece of a trauma story. Because neglect is often storyless, it communicates in painful code. It behooves us to learn its language, not only for the purposes of translating to a precise language narrative, but also because so many survivors are abandoned yet again by a medical system that tells them it is “all in their heads.” Unhelped or over/mis-medicated, they suffer, roaming from practitioner to practitioner or one bogus internet remedy to the next, depleting money they often do not have, and feeling more pathological, humiliated, often blamed, and alone. 

Thankfully, the ACE Study of 1995-1997 has finally come to the awareness of the larger world, broadcasting the “surprisingly” astronomical numbers of “Adverse Childhood Experiences” endured by the employed largely middle-income research pool of 17,000 North American subjects. Researchers have begun to link childhood trauma to health and disease (see neuroscientist Ruth Lanius’ 2010 book on the subject.) Many survivors like myself wandered in a desert of numbness or a tortured world of often alternating or otherwise confounding expressions of “disease.” Many are not so fortunate as I to have had a helper who could connect the dots.

It is now largely acknowledged that there are a host of (too many) confounding, somatic aberrations that may be the harbinger or the mouthpiece of a trauma story. 

Pain

On my otherwise idyllic recent holiday vacation, I had a little “mishap.” Admittedly, grace has never been one of my stronger suits, and as the years advance, my balance is not what it once was. In the middle of the night, in a very dark, unfamiliar bathroom, I slipped in my banana-peel-colored socks and crashed into the edge of the bathtub with my unsuspecting rib cage. Oy vey. My initial reaction was fear, knowing that at my age, many women have bones that crumble, and an injury could be serious. But well-schooled by Dad, I found I could pick myself up, finish my business and take myself back to bed. Sure it hurt, but… 

In the morning, I did tell my husband, and we worked around it, whatever it was, for the rest of the trip. I think I probably did crack a rib because when I yawned or coughed, I felt that sharp catch in my side. I remembered when our parents once had a little fender bender in the little Datsun, and Mom cracked a rib. There was no treatment for it, but she kept telling us, “DON’T MAKE ME LAUGH!” because that made it hurt. Fortunately for me, laughing was not a problem, but a sneeze could do it. I also happily discovered the analgesic properties of coffee, although the in-room coffee was not nearly as effective as the lattes made by our little friend at Starbucks.

When we got home, however, I had one really bad night. It was the night after I discovered that the heating pad was a real “game-changer” and quieted the pain so I could get my few hours of sleep easily and undisturbed. This next night, however, the pain was off the charts. I couldn’t get comfortable, and I could not sleep at all. My poor husband was frantic. I could not stop crying and could barely speak as I tried different every imaginable position, first in the bed, standing, and then sitting.

Finally, as I sat up, wept uncontrollably and shook, my body was wracked by involuntary movement that reminded me of the training I had done in the early 2000s with Pat Ogden and Peter Levine, where the body is completing unexpressed movement patterns locked in traumatized tissue. The movement kept going for quite a while, but it seemed to be moving the pain. Thankfully, well-trained by Peter and Pat, I was able to let it sequence through, albeit without the sort of mindfulness I learned back then. And the pain lessened.

I was able to go back to bed and sleep. In the morning, I awoke to what I think was an unremembered fragment of early trauma memory, most likely loosened and freed by a body sensation that resembled/evoked it just enough. And I woke up pain-free. My husband later woke up more rattled and less easily convinced than I. But that is my story, and I’m sticking to it.

When the body is in pain, it compels all attention.

Language

I remember in graduate school, which for me was back in the stone age, I read a book called The Body in Pain by a woman named Scarry. I remember being amused by the author’s name of a book on that subject. Again, how odd that of the thousands of books I have read in the intervening years, I remember that one and its author. I only remember one little factoid from the book: when the body is in pain, it compels all attention. One truly can’t think of anything else. The body is hell-bent on communicating that something is wrong. 

Chronic pain is a short-circuiting of the communication system, where long after physical injury might compel attention and action, the alarm bell continues ringing, probably trying to summon emergency care for some other purpose. We must work to stay present and listen: to both the language, and the story itself. The good news is that once the story is received and can be told in words, with luck, the messenger is free to go!

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

For better or worse, we are all too aware that nature’s design is to exist, survive and persist into the future by proliferating one’s likeness and perhaps broadcasting that. It is as if the world were a giant Petri dish of infinite rabid species in a wild race to replicate their own. Some organisms cross ethnic lines and collaborate to help one another in the endeavor of spreading: mushrooms helping trees, bees helping plants, many plants helping each other, and some of the heroic people who work to rescue the endangered from extinction. In Michael Pollan’s lovely book, The Botany of Desire, he poetically describes this. 

Left to ourselves, however, across nature, we would all be blindly cloning ourselves into perpetuity. With great frustration, I saw this during months when I was too busy to keep up with regular daily cheesemaker “hygiene,” and the roqueforti, like greedy imperialist pirates, ferociously took over the world in my “caves.” It was everywhere. Blue cheese is delicious and all, but when you are trying to make Gouda or Gruyere, it should not voluntarily turn blue. Oy vey. After my book was written, like rebuilding after a war or flood, recovery took many months. Lesson learned.

Many parents indeed strive, perhaps unwittingly, to sculpt little echoing 2.0 iterations of themselves, maybe attempting to get a few bugs out, maybe actually failing to see those and passing them on. There is, of course, great pride in tradition, bloodlines, and culture, and there is something comforting and safe about more and more of the same. I remember, as kids, singing “rounds:” Row, Row, Row Your Boat, Frere Jacque, Hinay Ma Tov U Manayim, repeating the same little song over and over with a different little voice jumping in at intervals, continuing to make a lovely harmony. We could go on like that for ages – it was so simple and sweet. As one with some undeniably OCD-like tendencies (unlike my variety-loving husband,) I find repetition and routine to be regulating and reassuring as well as efficient – call me boring. (I do get a lot done!)

Often, we work to “manipulate” or control proliferation or the direction of transmission and development.

Redlining

And of course, we find the inevitable mutations, some devastating like cancer, some less so. Some are for the better, which is how we get evolution. Before Roger Bannister broke the four-minute mile in 1954, such speeds were deemed humanly impossible. Since then, the record has been broken many times over, and by 1999, a mere 45 years later, another 20 seconds had been shaved off by subsequent generations. 

Often, we work to “manipulate” or control proliferation or the direction of transmission and development. This can be dicey and controversial: pesticides, genetically engineered food, test tube babies, some producing the stuff of horror movies. Some results are miraculous, like vaccines and disinfectants, or processes like pasteurization or retrofitting. So, it is complicated. I find it amazing that the addition of minuscule quantities of starter “cultures” (and I love the irony of that multi-definitional word) changes the nature of milk, making it receptive to transformation not only from liquid to solid, but changes in its sensory character, giving us literally thousands of delicious flavor varieties. Yes, interrupting nature is indeed a mixed bag.

By now, we are all painfully aware of the intergenerational transmission of trauma and neglect, the complex chain of repetitions that continue to enslave, infect, and blind ad infinitum. I am like a broken record on the gnawing subject. And yet it persists seamlessly in both the macro and micro. The nature of untreated trauma is to re-enact it, attempting to recount in behavior, a story too deeply hidden or too despicable for ordinary language. The language of re-enactment is insidious, and the ramifications can be like a tumor where the aberrant cells are so entangled with nerves and healthy tissue as to make extrication a deadly operation. Where to begin? Or where to continue, as we are certainly not the first to wonder.

In 1865 slavery was officially abolished in the U.S. That was President Lincoln’s most admirable intent. But the change only went so far – we did not get to the root level. We got “Jim Crow,” a way of formalizing and canonizing segregation and inequality, becoming a vigilante free-for-all. With “redlining” or refusing loans and insurance to targeted groups, the freedom-endowed blessings of home/land ownership, to hold and bequeath for generations, and suffrage were legally and culturally unobtainable to huge groups of the nominally “free” citizens. The wealth and intergenerational progress that might have been accessible in a truly just and equal nation were barricaded and jealously kept for the white and male. Obviously, we are still saddled with the self-perpetuating impact. Anger, poverty, disenfranchisement, alienation, and unaddressed trauma, large and small, is being visited on subsequent generations, who, if not helped, are doomed to repeat and pass it on. So, how do we break these intergenerational chains? A resounding question.

Acknowledgment is precisely naming and owning the wrongdoing, fully and to the satisfaction of the injured party, without minimizing, qualifying, or “explaining,” and verifying if the acknowledgment encompasses the extent of the hurt.

Reparation

Admittedly my own checkered past catapulted me from trying to work on a grand macro level to finding my place of work in the micro. It is only new for me to begin to work and speak more widely about trauma and neglect. I suppose it took me a while to get a voice, but there is no one right way to engage. We must simply do something, and if we do heal and transform ourselves, even unwittingly, like the roaming roqueforti (or Covid-19!), there is an undeniable contagion or call and response of some kind.  

On the macro level, again, it is “complicated.” In San Francisco, there is a loud debate about a local public high school long known to have super-achieving graduates with the highest test scores in the country. It has historically been predominantly, if not exclusively, white. There is vociferous disagreement about desegregating it and making it more inclusive versus maintaining the strict “merit” system of admission. “Merit” versus some iteration of affirmative action. What is “just?” How do we break the chains of repetition that cement the growing divide between rich and poor, which certainly in San Francisco is becoming cavernous, with legions of individual trauma and neglect survivors or victims exploding within it. Where do we locate the ”affordable” housing, if it is to be built at all? In “my backyard?” Hot discussions here.

I spoke with my longtime colleague and friend Dr. Forrest Hamer, an African American Jungian analyst who thinks deeply and teaches about reparation, asking him his thoughts about confronting this gnarly and enduring hydra. He described a three-step model of reparation, primarily based on the famed Truth and Reconciliation Process undertaken in South Africa in 1995. His model is undeniably and, of necessity, quite fluid, owing to the different needs and injuries of different victims or afflicted populations. It is not terribly different from the model of apology I teach couples, but it inspired me to rethink my own protocol, because this one sounds even better. It consists of three steps: acknowledgment, redress, and closure. I can hardly hope to do justice to it here, but I will lay out the broad strokes, and think on it much more for future writings.

Acknowledgment is precisely naming and owning the wrongdoing, fully and to the satisfaction of the injured party, without minimizing, qualifying, or “explaining,” and verifying if the acknowledgment encompasses the extent of the hurt. Just yesterday, perchance, I had a flashbulb memory of a client I had some 25 years ago, a man with a deep childhood neglect injury who, in adulthood, lost his life savings in the now mythical Madoff Ponzi debacle that spanned 17 years in the 1980s and 90’s. My client was wiped out, losing all that he and his little family counted on to supplement his meager earnings. He was never made whole and died way too young. What sort of acknowledgment is in order there, let alone remuneration? How much is enough? 

The second step is “redress.” What sort of action would be a salve and a meaningful recompense or gesture of rectification in each case? Would it be restitution in the form of financial compensation? How do you put a price tag on George Floyd? The legions of “disappeared” in Latin America? The robbed and ravaged First Nations of the many colonized lands? I heard from a gentle Hawaiian man the story of how his ancestral land on the Big Island was slowly devoured by mainland real estate moguls as it became increasingly impossible for Natives to pay quadrupling taxes on their long-held family properties. He himself, as a construction worker, was forced to build the very homes and resorts that displaced him, torn apart by internal conflict about participating in his own devastation, because he needed the work to feed his kids. It reminded me of concentration camp victims forced to dig their own graves. What would repair the loss of his grandmother’s sacred property, now dotted with multimillion-dollar homes? It is a very personal, painstaking process. For some, the cash is the redress. But not all.

The final step is closure, where both parties in dialog agree that some measure of justice is, at the very least, in progress. For many, this would include symbolic, ideological, and policy changes that would allow healing to endure and the wrongs not to be forgotten. Policy change alone, without community dialog and ideological discussion, can make for a whole new set of problems. I had one profoundly neglected African client, who, when he survived a round of layoffs in his tech workplace, was certain that he was retained simply for the purpose of diversity “quotas.” It made him not only less certain of his performance but the target of bitterness from apprehensive or displaced colleagues. I have heard other stories about workplace dissonance between “diversity hires” and “merit hires,” creating a 3.0 of racism. True closure, says Forrest, involves some kind of commitment to change that will stick and have meaning, that it is more than simply changing the street or sports team’s name.

Today I have more questions than answers, food for thought. For trauma and neglect survivors, what sort of response from perpetrators, if any, might heal? Or is complete detachment the more self-affirming path? And on the macro level, examining one’s own attitudes deeply and searching for a way to engage. When I embarked on the overwhelming process of cleaning up the roqueforti rein of terror, I committed to disinfecting the cave walls and checking each aging wheel every single day. Now perhaps eight months later, it is pristine in there and free of the blue scourge. Ah, were it all so simple… 

Today’s song (our dad used to sing this):

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

As all who have been in the world of trauma, whether as clinician, researcher, survivor, or some combination thereof know, the area of greatest injury to life and to function is the domain of relationship. That has certainly been the crippling pain, anxiety, shame, or simple cluelessness most likely to bring people to my therapy office door, and was certainly true for me. As mammals, attachment, connection, and interdependence are primordial, fundamental to survival. That would begin to explain the urgency and despair we experience in its absence. 

As human beings, love and relatedness are at the heart of what makes life most worth living, as exemplified in our art, music, literature, and all other media of expression around the world. It is a great motivator. It is the pivotal and most often missing ingredient in childhood neglect, especially in the developmental or earliest incidence of neglect, which is so much of what I see. By early, I mean the very tender and, of course, “unremembered” infant months and years. I say unremembered cautiously, because the desolation and uncertainty of isolation are in fact on record in the nervous system and the body. We know that by now, yet it is so “easy” to forget.

For many adult children of neglect, their mechanisms of compensation and disguise may be more skilled than what is turned out by the world’s top makeup artists. The void behind the facade of high function and success may thus be elusive to the naked eye, even to the self, at least some of the time. Because solitude becomes a default and even a “cozy” hiding place, it would be easy to chalk it up as being an introvert or “highly sensitive person” until some undeniable symptom compels attention, appearing in the form of a dramatic emergency – for example, my anorexic downfall, now almost 55 years ago to the day. I literally fell crashing out of my hiding place, certainly not on “conscious” purpose. Alcohol became another good clue if anyone had had a road map, but as has been endemic with neglect, nobody did

I flailed for a long time in a punitive world that lacked the psychological, neurobiological, and clinical options that we are now increasingly beginning to have, although critically insufficient. And I had the privilege of being white, middle class, with access to good schools and libraries to hide out in, which I liberally did. Even now, I often exclaim spontaneously to my husband, “I am so glad we live indoors!” I truly am, and so grateful.

I remember thinking I only began to learn how to be a “regular person” when I got my first waitressing job and spent enough hours with “regular people” that I could learn how to talk about movies, sports, television, and mainstream activities that I felt so ambivalent and clueless about. Of course, alcohol became a great companion in the process, as not only did it make it easier to fake it, but it also made me not care as much. Later on in therapy, I (not infrequently) would ask my infinitely patient therapist “So what do people do when…?” When they are at home in the evenings with their families, or on vacations with others? I still had only the vaguest clue.

I routinely admonished myself, “I just can’t get along with humans!”Although I have bristled against the term “impostor syndrome” dismissing it as too “pop psychology-esque,” it is probably too close to home. I was undeniably aware that I felt for many decades as if I was indeed of some other, probably mostly extinct and certainly less evolved species.

Central to the experience of childhood neglect is a devastating conundrum, a Gordian knot that, for many, plagues and tortures them throughout their lives if it has not been vanquished by early and prophylactic numbing (which it all too often is). Attachment researcher Mary Main has aptly called it the dilemma without solution: when the source of infant comfort and the source of terror are the same – the essentially needed primary caregiver. 

Abandonment, loss, and the absence of connection feel life-threatening which, certainly at the most vulnerable stages of life, it actually is. That is where the other side of the dilemma is congealed or constructed: the impenetrable Fort Knox of self-reliance. It is the safe house, the bomb shelter, the default survival mechanism until it breaks or fails, which it often does. The results are all too lethal both for the child of neglect themselves and for others in their wake, as we are all too often seeing these days as the disenfranchised “go off” and act out violently in the world. So many reasons that I am adamant about helping the world become “neglect informed.”

Neuroscience is forcing us to understand the profound and developmentally crucial impact of attachment on regulation.

Regulation

Neuroscience is forcing us to understand the profound and developmentally crucial impact of attachment on regulation. Regulation is the management of energy in the organism, the balance between high and low-frequency electrical activation in the brain, sympathetic and parasympathetic, stress and calm, terror, rage or nameless anxiety, and a quiet return to a hopefully comfortable baseline. A flexible and adaptive flow and a reasonable level of control over life’s inevitable vicissitudes is the great blessing of secure attachment. It is the gift of the good enough caregiver, and increasingly we are coming to understand this. Even the larger, non-trauma specialized psychotherapy field is increasingly learning this (no disdain intended.) Regulation is profoundly necessary, and sadly, far too rare. The mainstream is all too slowly connecting the dots, often failing to recognize the devastating damage of the desperate attempt to find regulation somewhere to the self and others, especially when it has not been learned at the developmentally appropriate time. Discomfort, terror, rage, or sheer amorphous compulsivity fuels the search for a way to manage unbearable ups and downs.

Because the feelings and isolation are so often points of shame, people often ask, “What is wrong with me?” How many “friends” one has, certainly in the time of social media, is a measure of “value” or self-worth, so the isolated may be even more ambivalent than usual about their need. 

Interpersonal need is so lethal that the child of neglect keeps it carefully locked away, often even from themselves. Because they might look good on the outside, helpers and the world at large readily miss the cues, or do not even imagine such an outwardly successful individual as being so distraught. So they slip through the cracks and remain invisible. They often defy recognition, even among therapists, if they even think to approach therapists. Suicide rates among medical students and physicians are disproportionally high. Where can people turn? And where can they turn if they do not even know what is wrong, or that something is “legitimately” wrong?

Regulation is profoundly necessary, and sadly, far too rare

Help

In the affluent town of San Francisco, the number of deaths by fentanyl overdoses beat the number of Covid-19 deaths in 2021. I find that to be chilling and profoundly alarming. In another story, six San Francisco fentanyl overdose deaths were stopped, and several lives were saved in the space of days by passersby administering Narcan to users who most likely would have died if not for such good samaritan luck. What if those good citizens had not walked by?

I am an avid supporter of local Crisis Support and Suicide Prevention organizations. I am so grateful to them for doing the essential crisis/emergency work that I am decidedly not good at. It is so needed, and so neglected. Oy vey. Neglect upon neglect upon neglect. It is literally deadly.

It saddens me that some of the most powerful treatment modalities we now have for restoring regulation are not yet accessible on a larger scale. Neurofeedback is such a godsend, and yet too expensive (for most prohibitively so) to provide on a large enough scale. Where do we start? Well, you and I can start by helping the world become “neglect informed.” It took 30 years for the ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) Study to hit the mainstream, but it finally has, and it does acknowledge neglect. Educate the world, support services, and policy insofar as we can, and we can save lives, not to mention ease unbearable suffering.

I was gratified to learn that our US Surgeon General, the young Vivek H. Murthy, has identified a major public health crisis in this country: loneliness! 22% of the US population self-identifies as profoundly lonely. We are coming to understand more and more of the consequence of that. This is the subject of his book, Together: The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World. I find that gratifying and hopeful, as it joins mental health on the incipient roster of important social and political matters. Yay! 

Again, my deepest appreciation to the Trauma Research Foundation for tying political and social meaning to the epidemic of trauma. More than 40 years after the PTSD diagnosis was identified and named, the larger world is adopting the understanding and necessity of being “trauma-informed.” It is a term that people are coming to know, adhere to, and use. I would hope to do the same with neglect.

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

When I started therapy in 1978, long before many of my readers were born, our mom muttered bitterly, not quite under her breath, “…the ‘blame your mother’ generation!” I have no idea why I even told her. From then forward, my therapist ever retained her reign as “public enemy number one.” Blame is not my paradigm – that I want to underline – and my purpose is anything but that! Rather connecting perhaps counterintuitive dots, that might lead to better self-understanding is my wish. And admittedly, sharing insights that might be interesting to me.

Similarly, “Refrigerators, Helicopters and Tigers” (oh my!) may seem to evoke Dorothy exclaiming the perils of a terrifying world or a bad joke (what do the three have in common…) So, bear with me please as I seek to elucidate more less than obvious expressions of neglect. 

Again, the deepest and most injurious sequela of neglect is the rupture or failure of the primary, most important attachment(s,) most notably with the mother whose body houses the child at first, and ideally would continue as a home and source of comfort, regulation, and protection from the perils of that dangerous world.

Perhaps the most integral and the first vehicle of comfort and regulation is the “simple” experience of being seen. Gazing into the face of a present and loving (ideally calm and regulated) other is foundational. Brain development begins with the resonant dance of the gaze and evolves into being accurately heard and responded to. Not perfectly of course. It seems so simple, no? A no brainer in more ways than one. Sadly, it is so very often lacking. Missteps and mistakes, of course, are part of the deal, but with repair, we are actually better for them. Confidence or knowledge that repair is possible makes the inevitability of imperfection bearable and survivable. 

The most devastating impact of neglect is the deathlike loneliness of not feeling seen, but even worse, not being or feeling known. When I am known as me, as distinctly, uniquely ME, this means I exist. This feeling or sense that I exist may, with luck, evolve to a sense of self, and with even more luck, a sense of self-worth: I exist, and I matter. Without it, we may drift unmoored in a foreign world, wondering what is wrong.

Gazing into the face of a present and loving (ideally calm and regulated) other is foundational.

Refrigerators

I recently encountered the term, previously unknown to me, “Refrigerator Mom.” (If not for the chill factor, I would associate such a label with an abundance of food!) I came to find out that, in 1943, Austrian psychiatrist Leo Kanner theorized that cold, unresponsive, and emotionally inattentive parenting resulted in children who failed to develop and retreated from social contact. Kanner identified the child’s aloneness from early in life as the explanation for autism. In the later 1940s through the 1960s, Bruno Bettelheim, renowned psychologist, researcher, and educator at the University of Chicago, advanced further acceptance of the theory with the medical establishment and with the wider public.

Although understanding of autism has evolved since then, I find it interesting that some time ago, the connections were already being drawn between maternal emotional distance/absence, the young, developing brain, and subsequent social withdrawal. I also think that my serious, intellectual, decidedly cool-tempered, proudly Oxford-educated grandmother might have qualified as a refrigerator mother to our mom. She was stiff and unaffectionate, undemonstrative and matter of fact. She certainly was not a fairytale baking and gift-bestowing type of grandmother, either, and when our mother was a child, pre-Holocaust, being of substantial means, I am sure nannies contributed to the distance. No wonder our mom, from my point of view, was disconnected and lacking in emotion, presence, and warmth.

Confidence or knowledge that repair is possible makes the inevitability of imperfection bearable and survivable. 

Helicopters

In our part of the world, hovering in the shadow of Silicon Valley, where many over-achievers are made, horizons are crowded with the so-called Helicopter Moms. These are the micro-managing moms that are on top of the child’s every move, pushing and pulling, prescribing and buzzing, or roaring as it were around the suffocated and overstimulated child. The hovercraft is everywhere, researching and making decisions for the breathless little one, who has no opportunity to even see what the choices might be. Play dates, after-school activities, sports teams… These are the parents overzealous in the stands, cheering the child on as if their lives depended on winning the championships. 

In his 2017 book, The Matheny Manifesto: A Young Manager’s Old-School Views on Success in Sports and Life, professional baseball manager Mike Matheny describes in detail the behavior of these roaring sports “chopper” parents, many of them trying to compensate for their own mediocrity, or failure, living vicariously through their young jock child. Mothers are far from immune. The incidence of Tommy John shoulder surgery, once unique to elite professional pitchers, has proliferated among younger and younger kids, being allowed and perhaps overly encouraged to practice and play too much.

Helicopter mothers are of course not limited to athletics, but it is a good example of the child being micromanaged, controlled, pressured to perform in some way that does not originate with their own will and preference, and too much. The same can be true for playing a musical instrument, some other form of art, academics… anything really. In effect, the child is a foil or surrogate, an alter-ego, and not a unique and treasured individual. Treasured most specifically for their exquisite uniqueness.

Tiger Mothers

The term Tiger Mothers was originally associated with Chinese mothers who mercilessly pushed their children academically to the point of illness and injury. In effect, it is a variety of abuse. Although that is where we got the term, I am more inclusive in how I would use it, having seen examples of these poor, exhausted kids across national and ethnic borders. I have been amazed hearing what kids had to do to be accepted to a local high school, in the way of not only academics and sports, but additional extracurricular activities (not to mention the application process itself and the tuition costs of such schools!) I would be breathless and wiped out from merely hearing about it! Perhaps the mothers did not roar or bite, but ferocity of the wild feline often sadly did seem to fit. I would find myself uncertain as to whether it was good news or not when the final acceptance or rejection from the school arrived. 

It may seem counterintuitive to recognize profound neglect in such seemingly attentive, “involved,” seemingly child-centered parents. It is similarly painstakingly challenging to help such a child of any age recognize their experience as neglect. Some may be blindly “successful” in their honed abilities and live dissociated and detached socially and/or emotionally: Kanner’s autism. Some may crash in their struggle around partnering, finding the fulfillment of the marriage and family part of the script beyond their super capabilities. Some may be like the superstar Miss USA, Cheslie Kryst, who seemed to have it all, and shocked the world when she committed suicide by jumping from a high building. As Amy Tan powerfully stated, “loneliness is not about being alone, it is about not feeling understood.” 

In spite of being seemingly swaddled with devoted attention, when what is being seen is not really me, it can be some of the most devastating, life-destroying iterations of neglect. Especially as the child, whatever their age, feels so guilty and unentitled to feel bad.

I recently heard an interview with Michelle Obama, talking about her new book, The Light We Carry: Overcoming in Uncertain Times. She said that we can create authentically independent, strong, and self-actualized kids by being present as long as they need it, then showing them that we trust them enough to let them do it their own way. Parents evolve, she said, from “managers to advisors,” thus enabling kids to grow into, and feel free/able to manifest, their own unique authenticity; kids that have the delicious opportunity to say with pleasure and pride, “That’s me!”

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

Our dad passed shortly before the pandemic of Covid-19 struck. What a blessing that was, as it would have been hell for him and for all of us to go through. The final couple of years, and worsening over the last months, he was increasingly vacant and absent, barely “there.” It was hard to tell if he was bored and disinterested, if he was hovering on the bridge to the next world, or if his tired old brain cells (those that were left) were not firing anymore. He was almost 93 when he died. When I arrived to visit, his second wife would bellow loudly in his ear “(whatever strange nickname she called him), Ruth is here!” His hearing aids were powered on, intact, and in place, but he usually did not even look up. It was as if I was not there. Sadly, to be perfectly honest, it was not that different from much of my life with him. 

I had the good fortune to make my peace with him, so I enjoyed a stretch of a surprisingly happy father-daughter relationship before he began his protracted fade-out departure. Granted, I did all the healing work on my own without his participation, but that is a story for another day. He did participate in a truly loving relationship with me for a time, and I am infinitely grateful for that.

Our dad’s final years, however, were a quiet agony. Thankfully, my sisters and I were a good team. But having my presence or absence not register, questioning whether those long, vapid visits had any meaning at all, was not only interminably empty and boring for me, but a potent reminder of the years of feeling as if I did not matter or even exist in his eyes. They were a living reminder/stimulus of long years of painful and confusing neglect. Admittedly, I lived much of those last two years in various degrees of trauma activation. Being excessively busy and perennially sleep-deprived, the routine visits took a chunk out of every weekend. But for whatever reason I kept them going diligently until the end – not without confusion and unbearable fatigue. 

Why? Was I afraid I might miss something if I did not take advantage of every possible moment with him? What might I possibly miss? I could rarely ask him questions about his life anymore. I found I would collect stories and topics and come with a “playlist” of things in mind to talk about, to entertain either him or myself. I honestly don’t know which. Due to his various cancers, he had been on a feeding tube for years, so my stories about cheesemaking challenges, my baking masterpieces, or food-related conversations, which are ordinarily pleasurable and easy for me, were off the table, so to speak. Our best bet on a good day was to sing. Interestingly, although he did not remember much of anything else, he did seemingly remember all the songs and their lyrics. Sometimes we filled the time that way, especially when I had the good fortune to visit at the same time as a sister, who brought his old guitar. She played it, but it did seem to awaken and cheer him.

Secretly, however, I remembered an old Cuban song I used to listen to and love: “La vida no vale nada…” life is not worth anything. And even though the song is about how life is not worth anything if others are suffering, I had to wonder, what keeps him going? What would make it worth continuing to live and breathe that vacuous existence? And when I dared to be really honest with myself, why doesn’t he just go?

When there is a long history of trauma, neglect, hard-earned healing, and profound ambivalence about its perpetrators and purveyors, their final years can be complicated at best. Some of us are too enraged and hurt still to be dutiful; some of us too dutiful to allow ourselves to feel enraged or hurt. If we are glaringly aware of both the parents’ own tragic and unconscionable trauma and misfortune and their own tragic and unconscionable lack of healing, it is even more complicated. Add to that whatever feelings we might have about what others (those mythical others) might think about how we navigate the loss of a parent. Some of us care. And many of the feelings are outside our awareness. 

I remember when our mom died in 2000. I was so embarrassed when people expressed sympathetic condolences as I felt nothing but grateful relief – or so I thought. I was driving the day after she passed, however, and my car broke down on the freeway. Much to my own surprise, I fell apart on the phone with the Triple A operator who took my call for emergency road service, crying rather hysterically to her about how my mother had just died. It was as if I and not the car had broken down.

When there has been attachment trauma, especially neglect, when little is “concrete enough” to point to, the final years and days of the parent’s life can be racked with troubling ambivalence.

Parent Loss

In his newly released memoir, Bono, who lost his mother as a small boy, recounts a legacy of rock stars who lost their mothers at a young age. John Lennon, Paul McCartney, John Lydon, and Bob Geldof are the ones he names, but there are many more, according to him. He refers to something parallel about father loss in the hip-hop world but does not name names. Interesting. He muses about some possible relationship between attachment trauma (not his language, of course!) and creativity.

After the death of his mother Iris, Bono grew up in a world of men – a much older brother and a stern, emotionless father. He had few memories of Iris at all, probably largely because the three of them never spoke of her, the space she had occupied simply closing up. At least, that is how Bono explains it. Neglect and abundant loss, however, are very often, if not usually, accompanied by a copious blankness of autobiography. In fact, one of the gifts of recovery is reclaiming or even constructing, for the first time, a personal narrative.

Interestingly, Bono did have one perfectly intact memory of Iris. His father was in an upstairs room, doing one of his many typical construction projects, working with a chainsaw or some sort of power saw, which apparently had slipped out of his hand. Loud screams echoed from upstairs, and when Bono and Iris ran up to see what had happened, his blood-spattered father was yelling in terror that he had castrated himself. Iris’ puzzling response was to burst into uncontrollable peals of laughter. She was no Lorena Bobbitt, and his father was not abusive. Bono was simply baffled. Iris must have been an odd bird. Indeed a curious bit of memory in a desert of idealization. (We never do learn what his dad’s injury turned out to be.)

To be visited by confusing, even contradictory impulses, and lots of trauma activation during the dying and death of a traumatic parent, be it incident trauma or neglect, is a natural and expectable response.

Peace

When there has been attachment trauma, especially neglect, when little is “concrete enough” to point to, the final years and days of the parent’s life can be racked with troubling ambivalence. One might, as I was, be horrified in shame for feeling such apparent and undeniable numbness around my mother’s passing. Over subsequent years of neurofeedback and other healing work, fragments of feeling come to me that surprise me. For whatever reason, I have her old sewing scissors on my desk. I don’t use them for sewing, but I keep them near. They remind me of her hands… I recall her terrible cooking almost fondly. Little things that she said will come to mind, and I will quote her, often reprimanding someone with a smile and shouting, “Put on a sweater, I’m cold!” or remembering the German swear words I learned from her momentary fits of temper. So, I don’t feel completely void of feeling anymore, and I do regret that I was not able to make my peace before she went. She went so quickly. It is really the only regret I have. 

To be visited by confusing, even contradictory impulses, and lots of trauma activation during the dying and death of a traumatic parent, be it incident trauma or neglect, is a natural and expectable response – even the silent, perhaps shameful wish that they take their leave already. I urge all to be gentle and forgiving of oneself, for one’s own swirling inconsistencies or perhaps even incomprehensible thoughts, behaviors, and feelings. If I am to offer one, my best recommendation is to do what will make you feel best about yourself in the long run, so the survivor of trauma and/or neglect can live, and in effect, “rest” in peace.

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

The child of neglect, often virtually from the point of conception, floats in a sea of solitude. Like a fish, the water may not even register, as it can seem “natural” or the norm, the absence of attachment being all that is known. Attachment, however, is not only a birthright – it is nature’s design. To be connected is a survival need, and in effect, nurture is nature. To be left alone and adrift is a crime against nature as far as I am concerned. 

As the child grows older, solitude may become the default, seemingly “preferred” state, most likely not consciously. The less familiar state of being in company or connected with anyone may feel like a strain at the very least, if not foreign, impossible, even terrifying. More than a few neglect survivors I have known found the isolation of lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic barely noticeable or even a welcome “permission” to simply lay low. Often, I have heard their partners complain bitterly of feeling perennially rejected. 

When I first started my anecdotal study and data collection about neglect and began to formulate the outlines of what I came to think of as the “Neglect Profile,” I noticed what I perceived as a seismic shrug, often accompanied by the words “I don’t know what to do!” or “There is nothing I can do!” Going back probably to the beginning of time in their relationship world, they felt that they had no impact at all, so the experience of powerlessness seems to rumble and quake from deep in their core. Often, these people are extraordinarily accomplished and proactive in other ways, be they professional, creative, athletic, or some other significant pursuit. 

The domain of relationships confronts the child of neglect with their core paradox: the central conundrum that plagues them, whether or not they are aware of it. It is what local treasure, Berkeley attachment researcher Mary Main, calls the dilemma without solution. If they allow themselves to feel their natural longing for connection, they are faced with a story and the ongoing threat of agony and, at the very least, vulnerability. What is to be done? Most likely, the only viable adaptation is to freeze or avoid. Often this also is the complaint of their partners: numbing, avoidance, even paralysis.

The domain of relationships confronts the child of neglect with their core paradox: the central conundrum that plagues them, whether or not they are aware of it. It is what local treasure, Berkeley attachment researcher Mary Main, calls the dilemma without solution.

Defensiveness

Most who have sought answers in the complex world of relationships have heard of the marriage researcher John Gottman. I have been an avid student of his for my entire couples’ therapist life of thirty years now. Although his therapy methods are different from mine, he provides a goldmine of scientific data, perhaps 40 years now of longitudinal research on what makes a relationship successful and the predictive factors of separation and divorce. He amassed all this information utilizing what he called his “Love Lab,” where couples would spend an uninterrupted weekend in his specially designed and equipped apartment/lab, with a video camera on them the entire time. It is amazing to imagine volunteering to be studied in that way – a heroic contribution to science and all of us, really. 

Gottman is famous for identifying what he calls The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, the four top predictors of relationship demise: criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and withdrawal. I won’t detail each of them here, but Gottman’s books are imminently readable and well worth it. (Interested readers might start with his book, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work.)

Often the adult child of neglect, when faced with relationship conflict, might lapse into defensiveness, which is a denial of responsibility or a pushing back when faced with a complaint, criticism, or rupture. And, of course, if I truly believe I am powerless, it is easy to claim, “I didn’t do anything!” or “It’s not my fault!” Ironic that the complaint might, in fact, be about what they did not do, when the child of neglect themselves have been largely victimized by missing behaviors that also were not done and experiences that did not happen. Oy vey.

Unwittingly, an expression of defensiveness can be “explaining” (“I only did what I did because…”), which sounds to the injured party like nothing but excuses, and is not helpful as a repair tool, unfortunately. But how would a survivor of neglect learn anything about relationship repair, having grown up in a relationship desert? None of us with attachment trauma of any ilk learned about relationship repair, which is what makes relationships so dicey. Without repair, any rupture in the connection is “fatal.” And, of course, no relationship is without missteps and misunderstandings at the very least. Of course, they seem like a collision course at best, and fatally dangerous at worst.

Unfortunately, for many a child of neglect whose futile effort at being perfect, or some other adaptation to the disconnection, resignedly resort to “leaving.” That was certainly my strategy, in its various forms: I tried to be away on my bike and then backpacking as much as I could; I lied and I drank, all from early ages. There was “nothing I could do…” 

Though thankfully I was able to stop drinking and lying, I still hit the fourth of the horsemen pretty squarely if I am severely activated. If I am not mindful, I am still capable of withdrawing into a private and impenetrable cave if I am upset enough. And admittedly, withdrawal indeed has the potential to be the most deadly of all.

And what if I am not so fortunate as to have a partner who will go to therapy with me? Are we doomed to relationship misery or destruction? It is a good question.

Soloist

Like many of us, I am a “double winner” with both attachment trauma in the form of neglect, and plenty of “shock” or incident trauma, so I am a veteran of some of the worst relationship-busting behaviors. Fortunately, although I defaulted to self-reliance like most of us children of neglect, that did not stop me from always seeking help. So, the one piece of relationship advice I ever give traumatized people of any stripe (or anyone really!) is to seek out a partner who is also willing to work on the relationship, because we will need to!

And what if I am not so fortunate as to have a partner who will go to therapy with me? Are we doomed to relationship misery or destruction? It is a good question. Partnering with a neglect survivor who is convinced of their powerlessness (blamelessness?) may make one feel saddled with all the blame and all the work of transforming both oneself and the relationship. Often there is a collusion about that, with both partners believing there is one problem child. Well, not on my watch.

I remember when my partner would say with the signature neglect shrug, “I will just sit here and wait until the sun comes out…” I would ignite with rage at the implication that the problem was all me, and its resolution was all my job. That in itself would make for a colossal escalation. I now know, and it is my intention to teach, that all relationship dynamics are in self-re-enforcing feedback loops – self-re-enforcing if they are allowed to continue with their own momentum. The best way forward is to work together to change dynamics. The good news, however, is that we each have the power to interrupt the cycle by simply not lapsing into the behavior that incites the other when they have activated us. I say simply, which is not to be confused with easily! Healing trauma is required, as well as building new brain circuitry. And yes, couples therapy is the more efficient way to create a new dynamic. Even that is a very tough road and takes longer than we’d like.

What if my partner, for whatever reason, can’t or won’t go to therapy with me? Does that mean we’re through? Well, not necessarily. It will mean that if one partner is willing to work hard, and carry the burden of stopping their side of the dynamic, knowing that it takes both of them to keep it going, or as I am fond of saying, “It takes two to escalate.” That means if I don’t react to the trauma reaction with my own trauma reaction, the old explosion will sizzle and extinguish; the drama will fade.  

It is a hard sell that that might be the only way to change the tide of the relationship. It may be too much of a repetition of one’s lonely and burdened relationship past. It may also be a source of bitterness, that once again, “If I don’t do it all, there is no relationship…” However, there is a chance that it might begin a positive feedback cycle which makes the previously unable or unwilling partner believe, that it might be worth pitching in and doing more. At the very least, it might be a source of pride, joy, pleasure, and even gratitude. “I did it for us, because I could, and I win by ending up with you.”

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

From seemingly out of nowhere, into my mind popped the theme music from Captain Kangaroo. I have no idea why; I had not thought of it in years – certainly not as long as I can remember. I always have a song in my head, but usually I am aware of the stimulus. I never even really liked the Captain. With the remembered whistling tune came a rather painful memory I don’t recall having before, when my sister was a baby, being parked in front of the Captain while my mother was with my sister. I felt lonely and left out, but also the spectrum of typical neglect feelings: rejected, unimportant, less loved/lovable, hurt, mad, and jealous– and most certainly unaware of all those feelings. To be sure, I had no language for any of it, but it all swirled in my little body and wafted faintly back with the snippet of musical recall.

I was two and a half when our little sister was born. I have always, and continue to, adore her. And admittedly, I was jealous. She was the pretty one, with great big beautiful eyes. People stopped on the street and remarked about those gorgeous eyes. Our mom was plain and non-descript-looking, but the new baby looked like our dad, who was proud and rather vain about being decidedly handsome. We recently found an ancient, dog-eared black and white of him flexing his muscles on the beach when he was in his twenties. Dad called our new sister his ”Little Monk” or “Little Monkey Baby.” Of all of us, she did not have a biblical name, so it seemed the wheels were greased from the start for her to be more “mainstream” or “American,” which I always rather envied. But long story short, her arrival meant greater scarcity of the already meager emotional resources in that house. So whatever neglect I was feeling was heightened and multiplied. Thankfully it never turned into resentment of her.

Our oldest sister was always more popular than I, or so I thought. I remember kids often saying to me in junior high, “Oh! You’re Becki’s sister!” And I bitterly thought but did not say, “NO! I’M RUTH!” But by then, I already doubted if, in fact, there was a distinct me, if I did exist, let alone had a right to. Existence is often a question that accompanies neglect. If I existed, would I not exist in the mind of the other? Oy vey, a child cannot think such complex thoughts. I just knew unquestionably that I did not matter and needed to find a way to compensate for it. (I have often wondered, how does Venus Williams do it? How does one continue to live and perform with such grace and dignity, even with immense talent in her own right, in the shadow of such a legendary sister? Kudos to Venus!)

Often neglect is a function of simply too many kids. How on earth could parents, especially single, traumatized, impoverished, enslaved by impossibly long and depleting work hours, or otherwise disabled parents possibly attend to more than a couple of children, especially in light of a western atomistic, individualistic, lacking a “village” culture of parenting? Neglect is yet another expression of all of these. And, of course, this makes it more difficult for the child of neglect to name their experience as traumatic, viewing the parent as the afflicted one, and trying to compensate for that. 

Many a neglect client of mine has been the younger or youngest of “too many” children when often there was not enough to go around to begin with, and jealousy is often the shameful and/or painful byproduct. In fact, whenever I encounter, particularly in couples, an extreme of jealousy, the first place I will want to look is at the history related to siblings. We often find the answer there. It may even be a case of a sibling with disabilities or illness that requires a disproportional amount of parental emotional energy or attention, making it even more challenging to feel worthy or to own the embarrassment of resentment.

Whenever a client laments a jealous partner or their own jealousy in general in the world, the place to look first is at the sibling story. Some profound neglect arises from the fact of simply too many kids. There was never enough to go around and with each additional birth, even less.

I envied not only my sisters but others too. I was always perhaps too aware of who got what and how much. I perennially seemed to come up short, hungry, explaining it as proof that I was not enough, and of course, the infantile lament, “It is NOT FAIR!”. I worried and envied about money for years, and when I finally became solvent enough to pay taxes without worrying about floating checks and holding my breath that they would clear before they bounced, I probably became one of the few people I know who actually took pleasure in paying my taxes – which I still do!

I was always perhaps too aware of who got what and how much. I perennially seemed to come up short, hungry, explaining it as proof that I was not enough, and of course, the infantile lament, “It is NOT FAIR!”.

Islands

I heard an interview on late-night radio – well, I should not say I actually heard it, as I was busily doing too many things, and my attention was spotty, like the I imagine the failing attention of a too-busy mother to be. What I did hear was a novelist, whose name I did not catch, being asked why he locates his fantasy stories on an island. He replied without hesitation, “Because that way, one can study a people or a culture without the influence of the outside world: the world outside the confines of the isolated island world.” I thought about what I think of as the “one-person psychology” that comes with neglect. There is such an ocean surrounding the child and the child’s solitary world, that the presence or influence of an “outside” world may be miles away, or simply non-existent. I always felt I had my own little culture, and in some ways, embarrassedly, still do. Until we recover enough to build a boat, an ark, or a bridge to connection.

Interestingly a life-changing event for me was in junior high, when I entered a national essay contest. High school kids from all over the US entered, and although I was one of the youngest entrants, I won. The theme we were all writing on was John Donne’s “No Man is an Island.” How ironic that, little island that I was, I wrote a winning essay on that. I will have to dig up that essay – I am sure it is somewhere in the archives of our family. The prize was $100, which I used to buy my first ten speed bike, which indeed became a bridge to life in the world for that disconnected young girl. 

Similarly ironic, some of my favorite places in the world are tropical islands: Hawaii and Cuba. And the British Isles and Greek Islands are definitely high on my bucket list of destinations.

I have always found it easier to give than to share. I am decidedly generous when it comes to giving. However, I never lend anything without being fully prepared to say goodbye to it, and sharing evokes even still the shadow of a gnawing fear that there will not be enough, so deeply grooved was the circuitry of scarcity and, to be sure, injustice.

Sharing

I have always found it easier to give than to share. I am decidedly generous when it comes to giving. However, I never lend anything without being fully prepared to say goodbye to it, and sharing evokes even still the shadow of a gnawing fear that there will not be enough, so deeply grooved was the circuitry of scarcity and, to be sure, injustice. Sharing people? For me, that was always out of the question! And when others talk of polyamory, I honestly can’t imagine how they do it. 

All this to say, jealousy, envy, hunger, and thirst may be lingering sequelae of neglect. Ironically, I hear the echoes of the old revolutionary rallying cry, Basta Ya! Enough now! Enough injustice, trauma, and neglect! And in our healing, may we strive to create the trust and safety emerging from that gnawing, when in real-time, in fact there will be enough. Basta!

Today’s song:

My book “Working with the Developmental Trauma of Childhood Neglect: Using Psychotherapy and Attachment Theory Techniques in Clinical Practice” was published on August 31st. It provides psychotherapists with a multidimensional view of childhood neglect and a practical roadmap for facilitating survivors’ healing.

My course with Quantum Way is now available for registration! 

The Trauma of Neglect: Identifying and Treating it in Therapy